Loch Ness Monster Essay
by: Shayli Habibian
Dear Scotland,
In my opinion I believe that they should stop trying to find the Loch Ness Monster, because searchers have been trying to find one but they haven’t had any proof, so it’s taking up a lot of time. There has also been many myths, and stories about the Loch Ness Monster.
Many theories about Loch Ness have been proposed. One myth is that it is an enormous, unknown water species, or an enormous fish. Many long necked species have lived along with dinosaurs and died out 65 million years ago. They are also thinking that a few of them have continued to survive. I also don’t agree with this idea either because if they existed all the way when dinosaurs were living I think that they would have found it by now!
Secondly, if there was a living creature that lives at the bottom of the ocean what would it eat, and how would it survive? There are no plants, food for it to live. According to the story there has been a picture taken in 1934 and in 2014. The 2014 picture doesn’t necessarily look like thee other picture in 1934. I think that the Loch Ness Monster is just a myth, also because I don’t understand why they would look for something that is taking all this time and money when it could be to something else.
People also started to claim they saw it. In the story it says how 1,000 people have “seen a creature” at the Loch Ness lake in Scotland. This creature could have been anything!
Last but not least, I think that we should stop looking for the Loch Ness Monster. Because if it exists they have been living over 65 million years ago according to their studies. I think it would also be cool to see what it eventually looks like, but I also think it is wasting time and money.
Sincerely,
Shayli Habibian
Nice job Shayli you are a really good writer. I really like your three reasons why we should stop looking for the Loch Ness Monster. My favorite reason is when you said that "if there was a living creature that lives at the bottom of the lake what would it eat, and how would it survive, because there are no plants". The only thing that I would change is when you said at the beginning of the second paragraph that if there was a living creature that lives at the bottom of the ocean what would it eat. I guarantee you meant to say lake not ocean, but that is the only thing I see.
ReplyDeleteAwesome writing! The third paragraph was a little confusing with all of the words, but it was very convincing. Great job
ReplyDeleteGreat job, you convinced me, I too liked how you said "how would it survive?" I wouldn't change anything at all. Great work!!!!
ReplyDelete